Reconstitution Compatibility chart (grabbed from another group)
-
Yeah, that caught my eye as well. I’m assuming it’s from this source
Peptide Precipitation: MOTS-c features a specific cationic (positively charged) tail. In certain environments, high salt concentrations (such as 0.9% sodium chloride) can disrupt these charges, causing the delicate peptide to fall out of solution and precipitate.
I guess it’s a best practices thing. I’ll look further into it when I get some time.
-
After all the discussion about saline for MOTS-C you have to confuse me with this, and I am starting this morning. Ughhhhhh
I’m sure it’s an over cautious theoretical risk, but why not use standard BAC? I didn’t catch the discussion on it.
“Knowledge is the ultimate power.
It’s not what you know that defines you, it’s that which you share, that defines you.” -
I can only guess it’s referring to phosphate buffered saline. For the non buffered NAD+. But it should clarify.
-
I can only guess it’s referring to phosphate buffered saline. For the non buffered NAD+. But it should clarify.
@Snake-Pepskin I wondered about that too.
-
I’m sure it’s an over cautious theoretical risk, but why not use standard BAC? I didn’t catch the discussion on it.
@Snake-Pepskin I did; people were reporting burning and some redness. I was fine. Guess I wasted some money; that's certainly not a first or a last.
This compatibility thing can be from anywhere. Maybe Josh Holyfield LOL.
-
Definitely had some burning. @stevepep I started Mots-c yesterday. It lasted maybe 5 minutes.
-
We're such strange creatures. GHK kicks my ass, yet MOTS... nothing as far as site reaction. I haven't researched NAD+ yet, We'll see how that goes.
-
We're such strange creatures. GHK kicks my ass, yet MOTS... nothing as far as site reaction. I haven't researched NAD+ yet, We'll see how that goes.
We're such strange creatures. GHK kicks my ass, yet MOTS... nothing as far as site reaction. I haven't researched NAD+ yet, We'll see how that goes.
Snake, do yourself a favor. Get the buffered and use at least 10ml BAC, else, it's gonna smart. I just reconned 1000mg with 15 BAC and it's a breeze. Not saying you should use 15, but 10, at least.
-
We're such strange creatures. GHK kicks my ass, yet MOTS... nothing as far as site reaction. I haven't researched NAD+ yet, We'll see how that goes.
@Snake-Pepskin I have had no issues with NAD+ and just use 3ml BAC. GHK-CU same for me that one just sucks
-
We're such strange creatures. GHK kicks my ass, yet MOTS... nothing as far as site reaction. I haven't researched NAD+ yet, We'll see how that goes.
@Snake-Pepskin I have had no issues with NAD+ and just use 3ml BAC. GHK-CU same for me that one just sucks
-
This might help someone.
@Snake-Pepskin Not sure if saline BAC and Reta go together. I read multiple posts on Reddit. People tried reconstituting two Reta vials from the same batch using regular BAC and saline BAC — saline BAC turned it all gelly cloudy. Regular BAC was clear.
-
I’m sure it’s an over cautious theoretical risk, but why not use standard BAC? I didn’t catch the discussion on it.
I’m sure it’s an over cautious theoretical risk, but why not use standard BAC? I didn’t catch the discussion on it.
Theory is saline BAC is isotonic, regular BAC is hypotonic. Isotonic liquid pins don't cause tissue stress that results in stinging or burning at research sites.
Single dose Zep vials or pens have saline sterile water base.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login