Peptide Critic Community

This is a vendor review submitted by Dry_Iron9773 on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (4/5) Review Shipping was fast and communication was smooth throughout the process. Order arrived well packaged and included free Hospira water as a bonus, which was appreciated. Product looked clean and properly sealed on arrival. Tracking was provided quickly and everything arrived as expected. Overall a solid first experience and I’d consider ordering again. Shop Felix Chem Read the full review: Fast shipping + free Hospira Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

@WowwyZowwy that makes a change… something for the aged, old lives matter! I’m going to add NAD to my next research order. Helpful experience, thanks

@brandenscheidecker my wallet damns you for this information. But I thank you! Order placed!

This is a vendor review submitted by courtneynewman on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (5/5) Review Ive used them for months now and have been super happy with everything! Shop Penguin Peptides Read the full review: SUPER HAPPY Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

This is a vendor review submitted by ImaFrogNotaRat on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (4/5) Review POSITIVES: After submitting my purchased vial of CJC-1295/Ipamorelin to Finnrick for analysis, I had the 10mg vial tested by BTLabs. The results came back as follows: HPLC Purity of Peptide Assay = 99.8% HPLC Potency Assay: Ipamorelin 5mg (50%); CJC-1295 7.7% (77.1%) Peptide-to-Excipients Ratio: 12.7:57.2 mg (1:4.5) [Recommended ratios of (1:2) to (1:10)] Wonderful!!! NEGATIVES: What led me to pursue independent testing? A community alert posted on Peptide Critic raised some concerns, prompting me to investigate further for peace of mind, along with a few other factors. During my initial research, I came across https://peptidedosages.com, a very useful site for dosage guidelines and reconstitution protocols. However, despite the existence of numerous peptide vendors, it exclusively promoted Pure Lab Peptides. This gave the impression that the site and the company might be connected financially or otherwise. What appeared to be an independent recommendation felt more like a subtle marketing strategy. The site stated: "Recommended Source We recommend Pure Lab Peptides for high-purity DSIP (10 mg). Why Pure Lab Peptides? High-purity, third-party-tested lots with batch COAs. Consistent, ISO-aligned handling and documentation. Reliable fulfillment to maintain cold-chain integrity." In reality, Pure Lab Peptides did not provide third-party COAs—only their own internal ones. It felt comparable to a sign reading "motel high recommended by owner." Additionally, the lot numbers on the vials didn’t match those on the COAs. The QR codes on packaging and the so-called "Certificate of Authenticity" simply redirected to their website, while the verification numbers linked to discount codes. A Google Maps check showed their listed address to be a postal annex rather than a laboratory. The lab images on their polished website appeared to be stock photos, and my initial outreach through their Contact Us form went unanswered. REDEMPTION: Eventually, Pure Lab Peptides replied with an apology and provided third-party COAs for the products I had purchased. These were, notably, conducted by BTLabs. The lot numbers aligned correctly, which helped restore my confidence. The vial I sacrificed for testing, along with the $288 I spent on independent verification, ultimately confirmed the product’s purity, potency, and quantity—personally, I’d rather confirm there’s more than less as was the case with my tested product, thankfully. FINAL THOUGHTS: 4 stars overall. I am generously forgiving, somewhat. The products performed well in testing—impressive enough for Ribbit, the research frog. The SS-31 in particular stood out, proving both difficult to source and more effective than other peptides previously tested from other vendors. One star deducted due to the lack of website published third-party COAs, questionable “certificates of authenticity,” stock imagery, misleading address details, and marketing practices that came across as somewhat disingenuous. Dear Pure Lab Peptides, please be more publicly transparent. You seem to have some great products, easy to navigate website(s), fast shipping, impressive packaging. Just be genuine and publish independently tested COAs for our peace of mind. The RUO space already raises red flags. Shop Pure Lab Peptides Read the full review: BTLabs verified Pure Lab Peptides product 99.8% pure! Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

This is a vendor review submitted by yogipepp on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (5/5) Review I just started with the CJC+Ipa from Mile high. I was impressed with the COA's and the information they provided. I like how they test multiple vials and give you the details of each. Shipping was very fast, much appreciated. I'll come back later with results in a few months, but overall - very impressed so far! Shop Mile High Compounds Read the full review: Love the transparency and shipping was FAST! Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

This is a vendor review submitted by rkynmama on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (5/5) Review PP is a great vendor. I purchased Cjc-1295 w/o DAC & IPA, GLP3, and some others. The prices are great, wonderful discounts, great freebies thrown in like a shirt, travel pep box and bumper sticker. Loved so much placed another order yesterday! Shop Penguin Peptides Read the full review: Fast, Excellent products and extras Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

@Commander I don’t think he has a lot of faith in the US labs that popped up and continue to pop up in small office complexes. I pretty much don’t either after doing a bunch of research and talking to researchers at the university level. Perfect example look at Mots-C on Nexaph it came in at 97pct from Jano. They disclosed it and Jano had that finding. They gave a discount as a result. Of late that is a first and gives me confidence in both of them. They didn’t get caught and then react they disclosed it up front.

This is a vendor review submitted by Stan Douglas on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (5/5) Review Nice secure boxes in padded box. Order was accurate, nothing more, nothing less. NOOO I didn't get any of my vials tested, I'm greedy, GREEDY! Shop Genpeptide Read the full review: Shipped Fed Ex Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

@davidwaisanen1 I run it at 3 to 4mg daily

@WisGal64 said in Elite Edge Biotech: @rogerp said in Elite Edge Biotech: @jamiegallien I have not seen many who actually have a batch number on the bottle that matches a COA online. I think its rare, but I would love to see that. Their products work. We have seen some test subjects lose up to 40 lbs of weight during testing. If you have any places that match the COA to the bottle that you know of, please send or post here. Thanks Glow aminos, Flawless compounds, EZ Peptides and Ameano peptides and Crush research supply have the batch number on their vials. Thank you for the info!

I have both and tried both. My personal opinion is, the Tesa/Ipa is way better then the CJC/Ipa. The CJC/pa made both me and my wife feel like shit, even at only 167mcg/167mcg once a day before bed. At 500mcg/500mcg it made us feel AWFUL. The 167mcg/167mcg did not help with sleep either. The CJC/Ipa cause a hot flushed feeling when you take it, kinda of like MT2. It didn’t help with sleep and the next morning I woke up feeling hung over. That being said, some people like it. Put it this way, I bought a kit from Nexaph (10 vials), I sent one vial out for testing, I mixed one vial and I have 8 vials left. I am just giving the 8 vials away….

@Commander Thanks for posting the link to that website - there is a ton of interesting info on it. Good details about the actual differences between CJC and Mod GRF 1-29.

Always double check they are providing a COA and it matches what they shipped you. A few weeks back they were shipping Reta 30s the tests werent back on yet.

Pinning ghk cut and CJC IPA at the same time can cause this effects

Just following up on this; I have seen a few places where people are choosing Tesa, Ipa, CJC, or other based on whether it raises cortisol or prolactin. According to what I can find, none of them significantly increases either, though as Commander pointed out, they are wildly different dosing protocols, so it may be that one has somewhat higher effect due to the much larger dose.

This is a vendor review submitted by ImaFrogNotaRat on PeptideCritic.com. Rating: (3/5) Review I was initially impressed with the presentation—fast shipping, well-designed packaging, and even a credit card–sized “Certificate of Authenticity” card included with the order. However, upon closer inspection, several issues raised concerns. The QR code on the certificate card does not link to product-specific verification but instead redirects to the company’s homepage and appears to function primarily as a marketing tool for future discounts. Additionally, the vial labeling is extremely small and difficult to read. After enlarging a photo, I was able to identify a lot number (83776) and expiration date (01/28), but there was no manufacturing date listed. More concerning, the lot number on the vial does not match the certificates of analysis (COAs) published on the company’s website. Those COAs also appear to be vendor-generated rather than from an independent third party, which limits their reliability. I reached out through the company’s website using their “Contact Us” form to clarify these discrepancies but did not receive a response. Given these concerns, I chose to send one vial—purchased at $169.98 for two vials of CJC-1295 (no DAC) + Ipamorelin (10 mg blend)—to an independent laboratory (Finnrick Analytics) for verification of identity, purity, and potency, incurring an additional out-of-pocket cost. While the branding, packaging, and online presence are clearly well-developed, these elements do not substitute for transparent, verifiable quality control. The lack of matching lot numbers, absence of key manufacturing details, and inability to obtain clarification from the company raise questions that prospective buyers should carefully consider. At this time, I would rate the product 3 out of 5 stars. Hopefully, the test lab will accept my submission and I can share the results with the community. Shop Pure Lab Peptides Read the full review: Batch number on Vial does not match Vendor COA on website Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.