Skip to content

World

Topics from outside of this forum. Views and opinions represented here may not reflect those of this forum and its members.

A world of content at your fingertips…

Think of this as your global discovery feed. It brings together interesting discussions from across the web and other communities, all in one place.

While you can browse what's trending now, the best way to use this feed is to make it your own. By creating an account, you can follow specific creators and topics to filter out the noise and see only what matters to you.

Ready to dive in? Create an account to start following others, get notified when people reply to you, and save your favorite finds.

Register Login
  • pep_researcherP

    Ricks accepts openly that healthcare is one of the worst experiences in this country, and that's why people are frustrated and are taking things in their own hands.

    Well appreciate he acknowledging this openly. 🙂

    https://youtu.be/llLg-ptTmRE?is=tOXZq8Ptw4aN0pIG


  • M

    Are these the same company or is NEXAPH SG on telegraph a copycat site?


    I also came across a Telegram channel called PeptideNexaph. The person running it was adamant that Nexaph no longer sells through its own website and was transitioning to PeptideNexaph. I contacted Cain at Nexaph directly, and he confirmed that the Telegram channel is a scam.
  • pep_researcherP

    Sugar at one time costed as much as gold. Made me chuckle, if it had stayed that way, maybe a lot of 21st century health issues would have disappeared? 🤔😂

    https://youtu.be/1-UDlJno0DA?is=WUg0EEdCMsWYrvP8


    Sugar can be traced back a couple thousand years to Chinese; a rudimentary form of sugar cane, which is wholly different from white sugar. It was very sparingly used and now we know why. Pacific Islanders, Hawaiians eat so much sugar and fat it's ridiculous; at least they did when I lived on Kauai. The ones of more Japanese and some Puerto Rican descent had a better diet.
  • Peptix USAP

    Hello everyone, Peptix USA here.

    As a vendor, we think that transparency should be the baseline. Just like other reliable vendors, we buy our peptides from reliable manufacturers, verify them via strict third party COAs and provide our customers with reliable and pure compounds.

    One of the most popular things on our site right now is our "Glow" formula, which is based on the GHK-Cu for anti-aging, skin elasticity and cosmetic purposes. As we sell it to lots of researchers, we are frequently asked about the baseline protocols.

    We give the baseline guidelines, but we want to get as much real-world data as possible from this community for the creation of the open-source guideline for the work with GHK-Cu.

    We would like to ask the community their opinion on some notorious factors:

    • Dosage for Skin Effects: According to our data, 1.5-2mg per day (SubQ) for 8-10 weeks is the common dosage of this peptide for cosmetic purposes. Does your subjects succeed with such dosage or do they need lower titration (for example, 1mg)?

    • ISP / PIP Mitigation: It is known that copper peptides have an infamous sting. What is the consensus of the community regarding the best way to mitigate this effect? Are your subjects sharing the same syringe with BPC-157, heavily diluting with BAC water, or do they follow a different strategy?

    • Zinc supplementation: The ratio of zinc and copper is crucial during this cycle. What is the recommended dosage and frequency of Zinc supplementation to follow when doing research "Glow"?

    We would be grateful to get any advice or data related to the subject matter. We will compile all of the feedback received to create safer and more efficient guidelines for all people working with these peptides.

    Best,
    Peptix USA Team
    https://peptixusa.com/


    Regarding zinc, 15mg daily is a minimum without copper. I started there with supplement. I didn't take zinc supps at all before.
  • mrjoshua44M

    I may or may not be addicted to these pens. They are just so darn easy and convenient to use, wherever you go. IMG_0630.jpeg


    I've use 4 and 8 mm needles. Left them in for well over 10 seconds. I still get the little drips. I guess its just the price to pay for the convenience of the pen.
  • R

    This seems like a catastrophically bad idea to me, but what do I know?

    TL;DR: people giving their 9 years olds Wegovy because they are obese.

    https://www.wsj.com/health/wellness/when-diets-dont-work-parents-turn-to-wegovy-for-elementary-school-kids-35aa9c05?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

    (This should not be paywalled.)


    Yeah, a big part of it is food, but when I was a kid we ate tons of garbage and sugar and we weren’t fat because we got kicked out of the house every morning. Sure, we watched TV as well, but we were outside all the time. I was also 10 when the Atari was released, so unless you were a bookworm - which i was - sitting around the house meant boredom. And even then, I ripped through books. I lived on my bicycle.
  • ?

    Hi all. My rat started Day 1 of MOTS-C yesterday at 0.5mg and felt perfectly fine. The energy before working out was amazing. Since it started at a higher dose, I was thinking of sticking to it once a week for 2-3 weeks but now after reading different protocols, I’m wondering if rat will be getting the full benefits doing once a week as opposed to 2-3x or even daily lower doses. Could use some advice on this. Rat is also doing daily Klow at 2.6mg and weekly Reta micro-dose at 0.6mg (planning on titrating Reta to 0.8mg this week-going super slow on this one). Thanks!


    I started low and slow daily to make sure I wasn't allergic. Then switched to 10mg/week spread out MWF. Now I'm back to taking daily 1mg (might bump to 2) because the afternoons of my injection days I would be dragging. At first Mots made me feel like Superman. I started Ss31 because of the afternoon drag, but that didn't help. So I'm trying daily again.
  • M

    Beside Hospira. What is the safest maximum limit we can still add benzyl alcohol to *sterile, non-pyrogenic water?


    @pep_researcher Ya I have no idea about this. I haven't done the research its totally second hand
  • P

    This is a vendor review submitted by Sonny on PeptideCritic.com.

    Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)


    Review

    Got my GHK quicker than I thought! And loving the feeling of their GHK-Cu. Don’t feel pain like others I’ve used. Good job


    🛒 Shop Alpha Peptides

    📖 Read the full review: Awesome and got my stuff pretty quick

    Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor.

    Please keep discussions respectful and factual.


  • J

    This is a vendor review submitted by Jackie on PeptideCritic.com.

    Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)


    Review

    This was the first vendor that I purchased from. They have verified COA's ,very fast shipping, promo discounts, and good customer service. I have seen great results with all items purchased. Cons: the prices have increased dramatically, and they no longer accept credit card payments, only bank transfers. With the bank transfers, they still charge a processing fee. Due to the increased prices and lack of payment options, I have moved on to another vendor.


    🛒 Shop Apex Peptides

    📖 Read the full review: Good quality and fast shipping

    Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor.

    Please keep discussions respectful and factual.


  • S

    https://youtu.be/IOjTGQSh968?is=pwuDwwKyiY8117nn

    It’s really fascinating clearly they are the standard. Bottom line after mass, purity. It’s sterility. He said he believed endotoxins testing was worthless but that one Jeep test he called an outlier proved him wrong. He has not seen a test fail endotoxin and pass sterility so he said it’s the best value after HPLC. Also said you can’t test purity in multiple compounds like Glow. He said no chance of Fentanyl but he added it because he said what am I going to do not take their money. He seems very honest.


    In terms of testing. My new protocol would be to first test for purity, get results and see where they fall. If its like I have seen on everything I have sent out (over 10 now) and its 99.5% or greater, there is like a .01% chance of something else being bad, but for my own sanity, I will take the next step and do Sterility and send in another vial. After that, I am good to go. I filter as well. When I think about relying on the testing from a vendor, I have lots of concerns, not just about the lab, but the fact that they are testing a couple of vials out of 1000's and choosing those vials. Another reason Nexaph is great. You have third-party testing and boatloads of users. Still, at least on my own its random out of 20 or so.