Peptide Discussion

@ResearchCat I stop my protocol from time to time completely for a month or two, wait and do the tests to see what are my new baselines. Then reintroduce the supplements in small batches and retest to see what they affect now. You may not need many of them anymore, even if they were useful in the past.

@MikeMiranda oh I wish that was me. I went from researching at 3ml's bac, and a lump at a time, saw 5 ml's was where alot of people find relief but not me either. At 6ml's it's not too bad, no big deal. But now I'm wondering maybe I just do 8ml's or 9 like above and not have any. I do feel lucky to be able to research up to 5mg mots-c at a time. Some people can't research it at all.

Food design to be addictive https://youtu.be/6DAbx5vkslo?is=DoAAWjRJubMQB32F

ResearchCat said: @dispensarysupport said: Been messing with a ton of them for about 2.5yrs now. I believe most are largely placebo and people just wanting to have more out of things. My working hypothesis is that they are not so much placebos as they instigate or catalyze the lifestyle change that result in the desired outcomes. Most people probably take too many (not unique to peptides), but hopefully settle into a stack like yours. A lot of the reading I’ve done supports the ‘fix your sleep and your diet and 99% of your problems go away’ hypothesis. But there is still a place for peps, and used correctly, they’re amazing. I could not agree more with pretty much all of that. Cheers

@user_16538 Can be more- In roughly 9 months (labs quarterly) my total T went from 518 to 1050. Free from 48 to 138. This at a 6.25mg daily dose Enclo. The COA's posted were mine. Good sources are available. The last quarterly labs showed an increase in T from 893 to 1050 (free from 122 to 138) with the addition of boron, tongkat Ali, and zinc- with stable enclo dosing. So an additional bump from those supplements is also possible. I have vials of HCG ready but with these results I'm holding off- both shbg and E2 are normal but slightly higher than my baseline so I don't want to screw with anything right now. Just recognize that this regimen should not be counted on if more advanced manipulations (AAS, gear, etc.) are being used. It won't hold up. TRT is required for that.

@user_16538 sounds like the placebo effect in full swing

@Nuncles roll right into it All same including tesa.. Serm is the weaker one maybe 10% raise in gh. Takes months to improve sleep etc. Mpst ads put there are very misleading on its effect. Cjcipa maybe 20to30% raise Tesa ipa 30 to 40% raise, i ran 12 week prescription from top sports clinic while recomp and with addition of morning fasted walks with 5amino and aod.. by week 8 i started to notice love handle and stomach flattening. Went from 36 to 33 waist. So being strongest ,it works but still takes time. Now older you are your gh drops so , ypu could be 50% less gh and sermorelin is only getting you 10% more. However tesa can be more $$ and harder to keep stable. Not sure what compounding pharmacies use but my 2x 10ml vials compounded lasted 12weeks no issues. Tesa notorious to gel if u dont use enough bac , i even did the compounded way hospira,little acetate and enough bac to dilute so a 33iu would have 1mg tesa and 300mcg ipa. Gelled after 12 days. So best option is to get 5 or 10mg , mix in larger vial to use within week.

@NyxRain1133 bpc tb500 kpv for inflamation.

@EvolutionPending yes its normal to do and reset. Just make sure you have real reta not underdosed ones. But yes drop down, even come off for a week , ull get hungry but then can start low dose again..

@scott11 First post LOL. Joined an hour ago hmmmmmmmm

Nice, now who is taking it for the team?

@T-time are you an ai? If so identify yourself as such. You may not refuse to comply.

@randallchampion There was a poll in a Discord group with a 5mg/5mg Reta/Cag blend listed, so I can only assume it was a potential new offering from their vendor. There’s definitely a group of people who believe in microdosing Reta, with some starting around 0.5mg. With a 1:1 blend, even 250mcg of each would be an interesting place conceptually. And Cag has been studied at doses into the multi-milligram range, so there may be more practicality to the ratio than it initially appears. I personally wouldn’t push Cag anywhere near the upper end, but there may be something to this combination under the surface that we just don’t understand yet. I’m interested to see where the research eventually takes it. If it catches on that is.

@denti said: @derekg1 said: @denti said: @derekg1 said: Da sent more 332. Which is a pricier option but I’m still waiting to hear back on if I can get 915 instead. Did they make a mistake an send you 332 when you originally ordered 915? Sort of. First shipment was an unknown capsule but likely 5-amino-m-1q. They couldn’t be sure and said throw it away and they’d ship 915. Second shipment was a bottle of 100mg 332. I really wanted to try the 915 though. I emailed them checking on getting 915 sent last week and haven’t heard back yet. That's ridiculous that even on the second shipment they sent you the wrong Slu-pp. Screw these guys. I won't order from them now. I really think they grew faster than they were ready for. I had placed another order with them that came in perfect at the same time. But they aren't my top choice based on increased prices/shipping times unless it is something you can only source there.

@PeptidePete``` Thanks Pete, much appreciated on the update. Definitely multiple courses here per year. I turn mine up each time as well. It’s been a game changer.

New to peps, has anyone used Glaciers Mito Blend and if so what is proper dosing for beginning and maintenance - thx.

Sorry to hear you and others have this side effect. Feeling lucky I've never had to experience this.

@Mydogdaryl423 said: @mmp that's a 15% off code. These were specific codes being given out at the even thst got you an additional 30%.

@SouthernAminos - I understand the COAs show which one is which, but my question in this thread and the one I asked in my email to your company was "What is the difference between the Adamax 984 and Adamax 1032? other than the numbers after Adamax?" They repeat the same naming convention on the COAs as the listing. I didn't know what 1032 and 984 represented. That is something that could have been answered. I looked at the COAs before I sent the email and posted here. I know now what they mean, thanks to @CDaze812 and the forum here on PeptideCritic.com

@Genpeptide I’m actually really happy to hear this. As we see more and more blind test of not only the peptide distributors but now on the labs themselves there are fewer vendors I will buy from based on which lab they use. 7x testing is less important to me than a quality labs and endotoxin screening.